Deluxe Ski Jump Forum

Jussi, as you see, if people have equal jump of example on 1. place, it shows only the person who did record as first. Not both of them on list. Should this be fixed? Because i think both players then have record and should have name on list.

Like this: http://puu.sh/5qLDG.jpg ? (Positions 36-37-38, 40-41, 51-52)

I mean http://www.mediamond.fi/dsj4/hillrecord ... sion=1.0.0 equal record WR

But here http://www.mediamond.fi/dsj4/hillrecords/ it show only jumper with that first jumped record.

mask wrote:Like this: http://puu.sh/5qLDG.jpg ? (Positions 36-37-38, 40-41, 51-52)

Is this going to be fixed for the next version?

Martin Kafka wrote:

mask wrote:Like this: http://puu.sh/5qLDG.jpg ? (Positions 36-37-38, 40-41, 51-52)

Is this going to be fixed for the next version?

I think positions are difficult because KO system isn't recognizing equal positions

mask wrote:

Martin Kafka wrote:

mask wrote:Like this: http://puu.sh/5qLDG.jpg ? (Positions 36-37-38, 40-41, 51-52)

Is this going to be fixed for the next version?

I think positions are difficult because KO system isn't recognizing equal positions

Yes, there may not be equal positions in the KO qualification. If two or more ski jumpers share the same result their start number will be the tie breaker. Larger start number is better.

Lightning wrote:Jussi, as you see, if people have equal jump of example on 1. place, it shows only the person who did record as first. Not both of them on list. Should this be fixed? Because i think both players then have record and should have name on list.

This is easier for the layout. I'm not sure what the rules say about this (or if they say anything).