Deluxe Ski Jump Forum

Jussi Koskela wrote:

Ralph K. wrote: The next point is the size of the hills. What about a few more information on this issue?

The hill sizes will vary quite evenly between HS69 and HS275.

Tell us more plx

Well.. I think we shall analyze the HS difference 'cause it'll be quite logical to put these new hills into the biggest gaps..

So the hills should be like:

1. HS69
2. HS275
3. HS between UK (85) and DEN (93)
4. HS between CAN (107) and HUN (117)
5. HS between BEL (126) and NOR (138)
6. HS between AUS (149) and SUI (157)
7. HS between KZK (163) and USA (171)
8. HS between UKR (203) and BLR (214)

But I believe we may expect a sightly different HS: a hill which will have HS between FRA (235) and ESP (242) instead of the hill in point 3. Simply because there would be too much gap between the hill in point 8 and the hill in point 2.

Yes, I'm DSJ-addicted

Ralph K. wrote: 1. HS69
2. HS275
3. HS between UK (85) and DEN (93)
4. HS between CAN (107) and HUN (117)
5. HS between BEL (126) and NOR (138)
6. HS between AUS (149) and SUI (157)
7. HS between KZK (163) and USA (171)
8. HS between UKR (203) and BLR (214)

1, 2, 4, 6, 8: correct!
3, 5, 7: incorrect!
I'm not being that systematic...

Ralph K. wrote: But I believe we may expect a sightly different HS: a hill which will have HS between FRA (235) and ESP (242) instead of the hill in point 3. Simply because there would be too much gap between the hill in point 8 and the hill in point 2.

Good thinking!

I think that

HS 69 and < HS ....> HS 85

Krzysztof Stuchlik wrote:I think that
HS 69 and < HS ....> HS 85

Me, too.

Ralph K. wrote:

1. HS69
2. HS275
3. HS between UK (85) and DEN (93)
4. HS between CAN (107) and HUN (117)
5. HS between BEL (126) and NOR (138)
6. HS between AUS (149) and SUI (157)
7. HS between KZK (163) and USA (171)
8. HS between UKR (203) and BLR (214)

1, 2, 4, 6, 8: correct!
3, 5, 7: incorrect!
I'm not being that systematic...

Hm, I expected Latvia to be somwhere between Kazakhstan and the States. So I'm a bit surprised

Unfortunately, I'm not the next incarnation of Nostradamus but at least 50% of my assumptions were right Or even 66% if we'll interpret your "good thinking", as "yes, i'm planning to add a new hill between France and Spain"

It's to late for any further thinking, but I'll try tommorrow to figure out the rest of HS

You could at least cross out the two non-included countries out of the ten possible

and Spain < HS24x > Japan i think

Jussi Koskela wrote:

Krzysztof Stuchlik wrote:I think that
HS 69 and < HS ....> HS 85

Me, too.

Now, that's not a good information, as I prefer ski-flying hills

Good night all

Good because i will have more chances hold WR in total

A hill with HS 300 would be really cool.

Krzysztof Stuchlik wrote:Good because i will have more chances hold WR in total

You have no faith/belive in your competitors?

Lol I cannot wait to see the new baby of the family

So, Jussi, the release date is still 28.11 or will you surprise us and let us delight in new hills earlier?

The size of 7 hills is more or less known.

The last will be than between KOR and SVK, or EST and CZE?

OK, now it has been officially stated.

Here: http://www.aireagles.yoyo.pl you can find the list of new hills and a screen from the hill in Georgia. Probably you won't have any problems with the names of the hills, as they're similar in Polish and Englsh.

The site is in Polish but in the comments section you may ask its owner , Maciej Mazanski, who makes a great job, any questions and he we'll surely answer them

Well done, Maciej!

Translate please !!!!!!!!!!!!